AI Monetization: From Smart Assistants to Commercial Link Entries, Exploring the Diverse Profit Models of AI
When ChatGPT partnered with Walmart, allowing users to complete orders and payments directly within the chat interface, we clearly saw a new breakthrough in AI profit models—smart assistants are evolving from "information interaction tools" to "commercial link entries". This "linking" monetization idea is just the tip of the iceberg in the AI profit ecosystem. From tool charging to scenario empowerment, AI's profit logic is expanding in multiple ways.
The most direct AI profit model still focuses on the excavation of "tool value". Take various smart assistants as an example, basic functions are free to attract users, while advanced functions (such as multi-turn complex conversations, professional field models) adopt a subscription-based charging model. Similar to ChatGPT's Plus membership and the "professional version" packages of domestic AI assistants, they all follow this logic—using continuous function iteration and experience upgrading to make users pay for "smarter tools".
As shown in the cooperation between ChatGPT and Walmart, AI is becoming a "super intermediary" in consumer scenarios. When users ask "What discounted products does Walmart have this week" in a chat, AI can not only give recommendations but also directly guide them to complete the order and payment. This "consultation-decision-consumption" closed loop transforms AI from an "information provider" to a "transaction facilitator", and platforms can profit through commissions, revenue sharing, and other methods. Beyond retail, fields such as finance and education are also replicating this logic: AI financial assistants recommend financial products and get a share, AI education assistants connect with course registrations and get customer acquisition shares... The more vertical the scenario, the higher the accuracy of monetization.
The profit potential of AI is also reflected in "derivative value". On the one hand, frequently used smart assistants can accumulate user behavior data. After desensitization and analysis, this data can be fed back to enterprises for product optimization and user operation (of course, data compliance must be strictly followed). On the other hand, AI capabilities can be "modularly output". For example, encapsulating an AI model in a certain field into an API and providing it to third-party developers or enterprises for use, while charging technical service fees. This "water-selling" profit model allows AI to play a more underlying role in the ecosystem and obtain continuous revenue sharing.
From the "single-point breakthrough" of tool charging, to the "link opening" of scenario monetization, and then to the "value cycle" of ecological derivation, AI's profit model is becoming more and more three-dimensional. When smart assistants are "linking" one after another, what we see is not only a business cooperation but also a key leap of AI from a "technical concept" to a "profitable entity". In the future, whoever can more closely bind AI capabilities with real business scenarios will seize the opportunity in the wave of AI monetization.
No comments:
Post a Comment